In 2008 the European Union adopted an apparently radical reform of its wine policy. However, whether this policy change actually reinstitutionalizes the regulation of this industry is dependent on how it is implemented and represented by both commercial operators and regulators located at national and intra-national scales. Using interview and documentary data generated on this process in France, Spain and Romania, this article sets out to compare and explain the differentiated institutionalization of the reform that has actually occurred to date. Its key empirical finding is that reinstitutionalization is dependent on the degree to which change has been legitimated within such regions. More precisely, durable change or maintenance of the status quo stems from how conflicts over different parts of the EU’s reform have been framed and debated locally. This finding has two wider implications for institutionalist theories of political change. First, constructivist accounts of the framing of collective and public problems need to be brought to the fore. Second, at least when studying contemporary Europe, the question of scale and its institutional effects should be systematically built into research strategies and methodologies
Comparative European Politics, 2013, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 119-142. ISSN: 1472-4790; 1740-388X28/09/2020
26/02/2020
12/12/2019
22/07/2019
21/06/2019
18/06/2019
Journal Article - 2021
Monograph - 2021
Special Issue - 2020
Journal Article - 2020
Monograph - 2020
Journal Article - 2020
Monograph - 2020
Journal Article - 2019
Journal Article - 2019
Monograph - 2019